April 09, 2018

California Supreme Court Overturns Jewel Doctrine

The Jewel doctrine is no more in California.  In Heller Ehrman v. Davis Wright Tremain, the California Supreme Court held that a dissolved law firm has no property interest in fees generated after dissolution for hourly matters that were in progress when the firm dissolved.  The immediate implication is that a lawyer who leaves a dissolved law firm and takes clients to a new law firm does not have to give back profits earned on those matters at the new firm.  The case also has significant implications for partners departing even when the firm is not dissolving, since it confirms that client matters are not the property of the firm.

Recent Posts

Physical Office Requirements for New York Law Firms

California’s Law Firm Registration and Renewal Process is Now Online

Choosing Limited Liability for Your New York Law Firm

Can Lawyers Just Ignore AI?

Be Warned: CA In-House Corporate Counsel Must Register With State Bar